|
|
|
|
1st February 2004 – 29th February 2004 Overall performance
A second positive month, despite being underwater for much of the time! This time though, drawdown was less of a concern, being limited to only about 4%. The early part of the month was dominated by continued pressure on the USD, although much of this was later reversed following the G7 meeting. Relative volatility remained extremely high throughout the period, with one exceptional day seeing a number of pairs moving up to 4%. Truly scary stuff! Certainly, not my kind of markets, but I’m encouraged that I ended up a little better than even. Some philosophy ….
In many respects there are two approaches to trading, although of course most traders will use a combination of both in some way or other. One is predictive and the other is reactive. Taking reactive first; by this I mean that the traders methodology revolves around trying to establish what is happening now, and then trade accordingly. Right now, the markets are seeing large daily movements, and the USD remains under continued pressure. Trend followers, or those who have adopted trend following methods in recent times should be doing fairly well right now. Reactive traders believe that when this phase completes, they will be able to react accordingly and change their style of trading to suit the new market conditions. At the other of the spectrum are predictive traders. By this I mean that they trade in such a way as to say that they expect the market to behave in such and such a way, in the future, regardless of what it’s doing now, and trade accordingly. This could be the result of historical testing, technical analysis (ie support and resistance trading) or a fundamentalist view point (it might even be the result of pure arrogance, but we’ll not go into that! ;-> ). The point I’m making is that predictive traders trade the way they do, because they feel that overall probability is working in their favour, even if they run the risk of appearing out of sync on occasions. Both approaches have advantages and drawbacks. By definition, the reactive trader is always in a little late and out late; he therefore runs the risk of being whipsawed to death. However if each perceived market phase lasts for a long enough time, and ends with clear indications this can be a great approach. Conversely the predictive trader is right there when the market is doing what they think it should, but it can be a painful experience when it is not. The above is a long-winded way of setting the stage to say that I’m primarily predictive in trading terms, and reactive in money management terms. I’m predictive in the sense that through backtesting I have a view on how markets work over the long haul. Very strong trends like the ones we’ve seen recently are, in my experience the exception rather than the rule. Hopefully sound money management will satisfy the reactive part of the equation, by reducing exposure if things are not working. At times like these I am more than happy with modest gains, or even just breaking even. If I can survive the ‘bad times’, I hope to be well set for the good. Individual components The following charts again show individual equity curves in percentage terms of the various trading components traded throughout the period. The charts are from the beginning of reporting, or inception, with this month's performance commencing from the vertical line.
Under simulation
Comparison with a speculative Oz Stocks portfolio (Australian resources)
|
|
Copyright © 2008 by Futurestech Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: This site is for educational purposes only. Futurestech makes no warranties express or implied regarding the content or the performance of this site, nor does Futurestech guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of the information appearing on these pages. Futurestech shall not be liable for any losses or damages incurred in connection with this site. |